Skip to main content

Evolution of Video Game QA: A 15-Year Journey

The landscape of Video Game QA has evolved significantly since I first entered the field in 2009. Initially, it primarily involved identifying and rectifying bugs across various features and areas of the game. However, over time, it has become more specialized, with QA Testers focusing on specific aspects such as walkthrough, content, audio, collision, and more. Test plans have become increasingly elaborate, with a weighted emphasis on different facets of the game, dictated largely by the game’s design and unique selling points (USP).

An essential aspect of Video Game QA, as with all forms of QA, is the relationship with developers. This dynamic holds particular importance in Video Game QA, as QA serves as the first critical evaluation of the game. Reflecting on my journey from 2009, I initially found satisfaction in uncovering bugs for two simple reasons: it improved my performance reviews and provided a sense of fulfilment in discovering developers’ mistakes.  

While these motivations initially drove my work, I came to realize they were not the right reasons for pursuing a career in Video Game QA.

As emphasized earlier, Video Game QA serves as the primary critic of the game. Many, me included, have reiterated the phrase: ‘A bug-free game does not necessarily equate to a fun game.’ In today’s expansive gaming landscape, where numerous avenues exist for game development and publication, a game’s enjoyment factor is fundamental to its commercial success.  

As this realization dawned on me, my approach to QA evolved. I transitioned from merely identifying bugs to engaging with projects at a deeper level, studying game design intricacies, and often collaborating with designers to refine elements.

This shift in perspective proved beneficial not only to QA but also to developers, as QA’s insights into game design facilitated the identification of alternatives and solutions. By fostering a stronger connection with the game and understanding its design intricacies, QA could plan tests more efficiently, resulting in comprehensive coverage and saving time while enhancing game quality. With games becoming increasingly complex, it became imperative for QA to engage early in the design phase, leveraging tools and automation tests to ensure thorough test coverage.  

As my journey in QA progressed, the relationship between QA and developers strengthened. Collaboration became central, leading to advanced problem-solving and a shared understanding that QA and developers are part of the same team. QA’s role expanded beyond bug identification to proactive bug prevention, providing feedback on the game’s enjoyment factor, and sharing both setbacks and successes with developers. QA transitioned from a mere bug reporter to an equal stakeholder in projects.  

However, evolution does not end there. With rapidly evolving tech & tools, QA faces even greater challenges, which will further deepen the collaboration between QA and developers, fostering a shared vision for the game.  

In summary, my 15-year journey in gaming reflects the evolution of Video Game QA and the transformation in my mind-set as a QA professional. While a lot more can be said about my journey, this evolution is the highlight of it all and I am curious about how it will shape me in the future.

Originally published on Yager Blog

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Mayor of Utopia and the Problem with Freedom

As a long-time fan of management games like SimCity, Cities: Skylines, and Anno, I often find myself looking at real-world maps and imagining how I would plan a city. It's a creative exercise, a way to build worlds in my mind. Recently, one of these thought experiments took a strange and contemplative turn. ​It started, as it always does, with a grand vision. I imagined a new city, an urban utopia. In my city, the infrastructure would be flawless and all resources would be absolute. Residents would enjoy free electricity, free food, free healthcare, and free education. Wide, spacious lanes would make driving a pleasure, not a chore. As the benevolent mayor of this perfect city, I'd also ensure my citizens were well-entertained, in the way they wanted and when they wanted. For myself, I pictured a simple pleasure: driving up to the top of the hill next to the river on quiet nights to stargaze while listening to old Bollywood songs. ​As the city grew in my mind, I thought, "...
Post a Comment
Read more

The DOOM of Sword Slashing

After I played Prince Of Persia Warrior Within I never thought that I would be playing a shooting game, but DOOM 3 came to me as a gift from my good old friend. I had got my new computer 3 days ago and wanted to buy POPWW so that i can again slash some sand demons. But I had no money left to buy the game. When my friend heard that I have got a new computer with high end configuration, he gifted me with DOOM 3. When I received the game I was disappointed and thought he should have gifted me POPWW, he should have known what my favorite game is. By that time I had completed POPWW just three times on my other friend's PS2. I wanted POPWW be the first game on my computer, but ok lets us what DOOM has. I installed it and stated the play and hey the game stuck!!! I then had to decrease the graphics details of the game and restart the computer. I started the game again. And was shocked to have a game with the graphics more than POPWW. I was upset as...
3 comments
Read more

AAA Game or AAA Studio

Lately, I've seen several game studios claiming the title of "India's first AAA game studio." This has me contemplating: what truly defines a studio as AAA? ​Is it determined solely by the final product, or is it a reflection of the entire ecosystem behind it? ​Does it simply boil down to the "AAA quality" of a single game? ​How much does the talent pool matter? Is it about building a diverse, multi-faceted, and multi-cultural team? ​Should an environment that fosters continuous growth and innovation be considered a key part of the definition? ​ My take is that while creating a AAA game without mature processes is difficult but not impossible, a studio that aims for both a AAA product and a AAA work environment is planting a seed for the future. That is the foundation that will truly grow and, in time, bear fruit. ​ Ultimately, is "AAA" a label for the game, or for the studio that creates it? ​Would love to hear your thoughts. Originally published ...
Post a Comment
Read more